Lineage and GrapheneOS have proven that reverse engineering is hard. So I'm wondering why can't we have a project that starts from scratch and build the electronics and the OS? In the same spirit of what Apple did with iPhone+iOS. I'm sorry if I sound naive, I just don't realize how hard it is to design a smartphone.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45586339
You absolutely can produce an open source smartphone. Pine64 has done it. ubuntu and purism have done it. Nokia was doing it, woot n900. Many chinese brands do it. fairphone kinda?
They can build fully open hardware and we have loads of OS that work just fine.
But why then does no mobility provider at all offer them in their phone offerings. Even if they were on page 34. Tmobile usa, everyone in canada for sure, has AOSP and KaiOS for dumb flip phones. But no open options? If you bring an open phone to them, you'll be imei capped and isolated and separately tracked.
But the answer comes when you also realize ulefone or umidigi are also not offered. It's about who is in control. I highly recommend your next phone is imported from a different region than you are in.
I think this is the same thing that holds back desktop Linux. There aren’t a lot of people willing to do that last 10% to make it really great for the average user. Instead we have a dozen different package managers, that average users simply don’t care about.
- Hardware components are often closed and/or documentation is confidential.
- Manufacturing is hard, manufacturers are busy with bigger customers, and you're at the lowest priority to manufacturers.
That was kind of what OpenMoko was ... the end result was pretty lackluster IMHO. Starting from a finished, proven hardware design is probably worthwhile to avoid shipping a phone that can't actually connect to real networks, and can't actually make phone calls if it does connect.