HACKER Q&A
📣 cuber_messenger

What do you do while ChatGPT-5 is thinking?


I use ChatGPT-5 Thinking a lot for day-to-day work. I prefer the response quality over speed, so I always pick the longer-thinking model. It takes ~1–5 minutes (often 1–2) to respond, but those short waits are getting increasingly distracting.

I find myself doing something else, and it eventually takes more than the thinking time. Such as right now, it takes me 5 minutes to write this post, and ChatGPT responded like 3 minutes ago.

Does anyone else have the same problem? What do you do during these gaps? :D


  👤 chainofthought Accepted Answer ✓
I'm always prompting. I let Gemini calendar my time (Google Calendar, of course) so that there are zero gaps where unwanted human thought could sneak in. I use an agent manager called Pelican to check in with all of my agents every second and have them tell me what I should be working on next using meta-agents, which are agents running tools in a loop to run tools in a loop. It's super effective!

👤 loveparade
I often use that time to spec out a future task. Either by going through Github issues, doing some research and adding details, or by spinning up another codex/claude session to create a detailed design document for a future task and iterating on that. So one agent is coding while another is helping me to spec out future work. So when the coding agent is done I can immediately start on the next task with a proper spec, reducing margin for error.

👤 pols45
I cut and paste the chats into other GPTs to see what they have to say.

👤 cantouch
Use Black Screen app (https://blackscreen1.com/) to stare at the backness of all your monitors. Or look at some random photos with it. :-)

👤 dotancohen
Anki. Or pushups.

Anki and AnkiDroid are perfect for filling in those few minutes throughout the day. And if you're in a private environment, a small set of pushups a few times a day keep you awake and make you feel great.


👤 al_borland
I stare are the prompt impatiently, thinking to myself how annoying the wait is and how it used to be faster.

👤 johnwheeler
This is a timely and interesting topic, I was just thinking about this the other day. What I've been doing lately is context switching between two different tasks, which is not ideal and you do forget what's going on between the two. The alternative seems to be to just be idle. I'm trying to prepare myself for a future where agents are much more autonomous, and I can give them tasks and just have them go run with them. This seems like the path to that, but if anyone has better ideas, I'm all for hearing them.

👤 aitchnyu
Aider can generate sounds and notifications after it complete its output. Not that it makes me more disciplined. Still waiting for LLMs with ultra fast output.

👤 eugene-kim
When using codex-cli / Claude Code, I look for opportunities to improve either the AGENTS.md file based on the path that the LLM is taking or to improve repo structure, docs, var names, etc that might help make things more clear in the future. Since this is still somewhat task related, I can usually stay focused.

I haven't had much luck doing two completely different tasks at the same time. At net I think it slows me down due to the context switching.


👤 maremmano
Obviously I move the mouse pointer so as not to freeze the machine and speed up the process.

👤 jf22
If I can context switch between two prompts I will.

If the task is hard and I can't easily break context I'll do exercises, chores, or comment on HN.