HACKER Q&A
📣 Lazaruscv

Is AI-based debugging for robotics feasible?


* Can AI models meaningfully detect “emergent” errors (timing drift, sensor desync, hardware degradation)?

* Or is this a problem better solved through deterministic verification and better tooling?

Would love to hear real-world perspectives from those working in robotics infrastructure, fleet management, or simulation , what’s actually working (or not)?

  👤 clubanga Accepted Answer ✓
Yes they can but they need grounding to mitigate infinite regress and hallucination. They can be grounded as a y combinator fixed point λ := ∀x (x -> x).
👤 bigyabai
> Can AI models meaningfully detect “emergent” errors (timing drift, sensor desync, hardware degradation)?

Basic arithmetic can meaningfully detect every error you just listed. AI probably cannot "beat the odds" against a simple integral function.

👤 chfritz
You seem to describe the problem of automated anomaly detection. Many companies tried or are trying to solve this (e.g., Heex), but I don't think anyone has done it definitively. The issue is that "normal" behavior keeps changing, so its difficult to build a model of what is abnormal. And by the time the behavior of the robots in the fleet becomes more stable (in all aspects, physical, electrical, networking, logging, etc.), it's usually easy for the engineers who built it to put in the right metrics and health-monitoring checks to detect issues. So even though theoretically automated anomaly detection sounds like the holy grail of fleet observability, in practice, it's not such a big deal.

So I guess to answer your question, I think yes, the second, better tooling (and a ton of metrics data collected from the fleet with good versioning).