Even with AGI, it wouldn't know what you know. Can we preserve that?

Question

Even if we had true AGI, even if that AGI attained top .001% human-level intelligence as a product, that product would still not have your experiences and knowledge of a given project or domain. It could not replace you.That AGI didn't experience what you have experienced. How could it without recording all of your audio and visual input?Clearly, I am not the first person to think of this concept. My question is: is it important for us to fight the inevitable attempt at capture of all our audio/visual existence? Or, is this a Luddite concept in 2025?

bigyabai · Accepted Answer

In all likelihood, you individually do not live an interesting or successful enough life to be good training data. Data brokers probably cannot sell AI trainers the bulk data pertaining to your personal experience.

alganet · Answer

I don't understand what you are saying.Is it some elaboration on "It's useless, humans are better, therefore stop trying to collect data?".If it is, it is more of an assertion than a question. Those are rather common, and there isn't much to say about them.If it's not, you should express your doubts better. Explain in detail where you're coming from.