> "We spend 70-80 hours a week in the office and, more often than not, work nights and weekends."
My first thought was "if they're expecting somebody to work 2x the standard hours, they need to pay at least 2.5x the standard salary".
But then I started wondering whether I was just out of touch and clinging to some out-of-date expectation of 40hr work weeks.
If anything, as I've progressed in my career I feel like things have loosened up so the actual expectation is 40 hours of "availability" and the actual work is confined to some subset of those hours.
I also work on my own projects every night from ~8pm to midnight or 2am. So I'm still good to code, but I either get exhausted by, or lose interest in the day job stuff by 6 or 7pm. It's time for dinner, put on a show or a movie and work on the stuff I'm actually passionate about.
I get out on the weekends or work on projects that aren't programming.
Your employment at the company is only partially due to how good you are. If management blows the company up, well, it was all wasted.
You (and arguably the company) are better off spending your 40 hours being as productive as possible, and using the rest of the time enjoying your evenings, family, books, tv shows, whatever, and recharge until the next day.
I can make around $25k usd per month, but I usually don’t spend too much.
I love building products and now with AI, I am getting better at exponential rates.
I’m 33 years old, live in Mexico. I stay fit, maintain a skin care routine and try to be social. I’m single by choice.
I’m sure I’ll be able to find a good wife, once I feel accomplished. But right now, and for the past 10 years, I’ve been going harder and harder.
IMHO, in reality, salaries are only superficially related to any notion of how much or hard one works, or how much value one provides, or can provide. I think it's too complex for me to fully understand why this is, but I've seen too many examples of hard workers earning peanuts, and morons/charlatons earning loads, to believe that there's actually a nice line going up between experience/work ethic and remuneration. Supply and demand is only half the story, nepotism is in there somewhere, "marketing yourself", leverage etc. The point is: this ad is either asking for 80h weeks for 1x salary because they think they can realistically get that, or they think it sends a signal to a type of candidate they want.
I have to be protective of my time since I’m on the east coast and my west coast colleagues, even after several years, still assume everyone lives in the Bay Area. I’ll sign off and still get a flurry of messages and requests until it’s time for them to leave at 5.
Floor of 40 hours, usually closer to 50.
That's a red flag if I ever saw one. Hardly anyone can sustain 70h/w for longer than a year without drastically losing productivity. Not even in their 20's and most certainly not in their 40's.
Some companies are just garbage companies and can't figure out what they want to build, but others are laser focused on tangible goals. There's a whole spectrum in between and companies often move within in over time. Obviously in companies that dont know what they want, devs are less well utilized, while the more a company's management is communicating the vision well, the more utilized, or overutilized, the devs are.
I freelance 2-3 days a week outside of teaching hours, so 16-24 hours.
My freelance aligns highly with my interests, so my personal programming projects are in fourth row having just had a child. I work in one-hour sprints now, because that's the time I have between the child sleeping.
Anticipating a child, I tried to minimize the hours I spent working without impacting my salary significantly.
I work in a semiconductor company, at a fairly high technical level but I'm no superstar.
That to me seems like a reasonable expectation from most employers at my salary.