I can understand not asking it for more senior roles where there's a lot of history to draw on but for graduates/interns/juniors/mids do you ask them what they building on the side and see where their passions lie? Or do we just sound like relics from a bygone era?
* Some places are incredibly interested in my side projects. They want to know about the motivation, the solution, and more. These places are really interested in what interests the candidate, their initiative, and their capacity for independently solving real problems.
* Some places are mild concerned about side projects, because they want to determine the real level of actual experience and capabilities, but are otherwise interested in anything about the side projects.
* Most of the time they only want to know about work history. In these cases I really feel like they are looking for mindless automatons on conveyor belt to supplement their pool of low confidence beginners.
This experience from interviewing for JavaScript related jobs. I stopped doing that line of work more than a year ago. Now, in the real world, places are more interested in my prior leadership experiences. This mostly means all the overseas adventures I have gone on in the military and only mild interest in my side programming projects just enough to know that I am a self-starter.
Due to the age of AI, I ask it to *everyone*. It is enough to filter in those who would go the extra mile to build high quality and widely used software dependent on by others versus those who just call it a day.
Obviously, I would be interested if it is the following:
* It should not be a hello world project.
* The project solves a problem that is relevant or similar to the job description.
* The company happens to use a critical piece of software that the person is maintaining or has contributed to.
* It makes money.
It's very simple, but the goal is to give an easy reason to the interviewer as to why you are "exceptional" against the competition. We are also in the age where there is rampant title inflation. "Juniors" posing as "Seniors" and vice versa. So weeding them out with extra projects, etc is exactly what I would do.
"Seniority" and work history is just not good enough against 100s of "seniors" or "juniors" in the candidate pipeline.