VP: Gives the IC a dubious signal about a promo in the next cycle, mentioning tenure, budget constraints, or something incredibly vague.
IC: Lets go of the promo and seeks to switch teams at the same level in search of more interesting work and possibly to avoid a similar situation in the next cycle.
VP: Feels betrayed, claiming they were working hard on the promo case and that it might have happened in the next cycle.
IC: Gets accepted into a different team and wants to transition to the new role as smoothly as possible without burning bridges.
VP: Demands a three-month grace period.
IC: It wouldn't be fair to the new team and would probably result in losing the opportunity.
How should the IC navigate a situation like this?
For switching, tell the VP you'll ask the new team what's possible. Go to your new VP and tell them that old VP wants this, but make it implicitly clear that you don't want this. Go back to your old VP and tell them that you don't think the long transfer period is going to work with the new team (but you tried!), but that you will still be around to help the team answer any questions.
Once you switch, deprioritize the old team. Deprioritize them slowly enough that you keep a good relationship with old VP, but let it be pretty clear that you're not gonna be doing any coding and only the bare minimum of consulting.
You should only debate promo likelihood while you're still on the team. Once you've decided to leave, drop it from discussion.
You'll almost certainly find that its just puffery, but if you give them a chance to substantiate and they don't, then they don't get to feel untrusted/betrayed later.
You can have a small one-on-one conversation and air it out. Explain that you are honored to be considered, and perhaps that discussion can lead to a better end here, versus a bitter one.
We cannot constantly run from the fact that we deal with human beings with emotions in this life, as clinical as we want to be.
Do what's best for you. If you're trying to keep things smooth, cut the grace period to a month max with a clear ramp-down plan. If you had quit, they wouldn’t have gotten even that.
In conclusion be nice but don’t take any shit, this VP doesn’t have your best interests at heart otherwise they’d wish you well.
As a general rule, once you get beyond the initial junior -> mid -> senior level early career hops.... promotions are not given because you did your job well. They are given when you lift up your peers or direct reports to be able to to do your job well.
Offers to stay tend to be full of bullshit.
I have fielded 3 offers to stay instead of moving on, and the only one I regretted was the offer I accepted.
2 of these times, I was basically being offered a "Promotion" but in in both cases it was seat warming duty while the owner ran for the exit.
In 1 of these cases I ended up as a consultant at the acquiring firm, for nearly twice the money, having to coax the seat warmers who took the position I was offered through the process of integrating the acquisition.
Those arent internal moves but the last example isnt far off.
Also: I found that if you are concerned about damaging the relationship, the relationship isnt that strong / worth holding on to.
If VP's signals about promotion were not backed by some form of agreement, I can't blame the IC for looking for another place under the sun.
I have issues when companies don't support vertical/horizontal movement among the teams. It is in human nature to develop different interests.
Probably can’t say that to the old boss/VP even if it’s true. So tell a little white lie and sooth the VP’s fragile ego.
* Only wear the title they provide you, don’t make your own.
* Accomplish what is asked of you. Again, don’t confuse signals for reality. How badly they want something accomplished, and in what way they want it accomplished, is directly proportional to the explicitness of the ask.
* If you work for a sociopath throw all these rules out the window and either go work somewhere else or be their carpet for them to wipe their feet on.