Why does Mozilla not allow to pay for Firefox directly, and only offers supplemental paid products like Mozilla VPN?
I understand that most people would still use FF for free, but what economic reasoning is there to not even allow donations / supporter-tier subscriptions?
(In case there is such an option any pointers would be higly appreciated!)
I recall some firefox dev about how google blink (and google online services) are going into the shaddy/ultra-complex parts of the "javascript web" to break firefox, namely making firefox an significantly less optimal javascripted browser for google services than google blink, or even their brother (apple is a vanguard/blackrock company too) engine, webkit (blink was forked from webkit).
The only way out is all critical(utility/etc in the US) online services which can reasonable be handled by noscript/basic (x)html standard, have to be (like they mostly were before...).
I personnaly do not like firefox neither since it is a c++ kludge abomination, to pathological level, and pulling a c++ compiler makes things even worse (rust syntax is toxicely complex like c++, then this is not a way out, may be worse). No, if you code c++, you are not smart, at best brain-washed , but surely toxic.
and they dont have to deal with chargebacks or customer complaints
brilliant right
i know i know
[0] https://help.kagi.com/kagi/features/bangs.html#kagi-assistan...