Many years ago I would have envisioned that working for Facebook was quite the status symbol, but now with years and years of scandals, putting children (mental health, sextortion) and maybe even geopolitics at risk, and Mark Zuckerberg spending his days training in MMA rather than dealing with the issues, it seems like that might have changed?
Meta, like any large organization, faces complex challenges and public scrutiny. It’s misleading to focus solely on the negative aspects without acknowledging the positive contributions and efforts to address these issues.
Leaders can and do have personal lives and interests outside their professional responsibilities. Suggesting that his hobbies indicate a lack of commitment to Meta is an ad hominem attack.
It has ways been like working to a cigarette company, spreading cancer around the world.
I got offers from Meta (then Facebook) and Google and Amazon, and went with Amazon because they have way more actual value than Google or Amazon that is concrete.