For context, I recently heard having a breadth of knowledge (along with depth in chosen areas) is really helpful in problem solving and I'm looking for concrete examples for the same.
ISO 9001 was implemented in manufacturing, and is quite popular in many circles of hell.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=18129095207210817...
https://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/9602/rediscover...
One of the most prolific scientists Albert Einstein had his single most productive year while working as a patent officer (Annus Mirabilis). I strongly suspect that he learned quite a lot from many patent applications, journal papers and books that he was required to read during his daily job, thus getting excellent and novel ideas from seemingly unrelated patents and discoveries.
The classic modern example (sorry for the oxymoron terminology) is how a patented signal processing technique of radio astronomy research by CSIRO solved the wireless multi-path propagation problem that enabled wireless revolution from WiFi to 4G/5G.
CSIRO's patent leads to the wireless OFDM invention that allows for much higher communication bandwidth especially on wireless environment where unmitigated multi-path interference is a deal breaker. But of course wireless people just hate to admit it [1].
[1]https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/04/how-the-aussie-g...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB116346916169622261
Knowledge from pit stop procedures improves speed and decreases accidents in hospital settings.
https://www.irenebrination.com/irenebrination_notes_on_a/201...
Many filters in Robotics (Kalman Filter, Particle Filter) and many concepts in digital communication (Modulation Schemes, Filters, ...) are firmly rooted in statistics and require a decent applied understanding of the area.
We sometimes refer to software systems as held together with spit and baling wire, but it's never literally true.
Others have noted the general influence in the opposite direction of the Toyota Production System on software engineering methodologies (most notably in that family of processes labeled "Lean"), but it is pretty clear Tesla could have stood to take a bit more direct influence from TPS on their assembly line.
We haven't seen anything like that at SpaceX (despite much armchair prognostication), but then, even as they ramp up production and launches, each rocket is still somewhat a bespoke product, and no one is going to get in trouble for holding up the production schedule when a problem is noted. Each rocket is still very much a pet, rather than cattle. It remains to be seen if the pace of iteration will slack off (or start conforming to a more regular punctuated cadence) as SpaceX continues to ramp up their capacity.
There have been a few efforts recently to try and apply aviation safety lessons to healthcare.
Interesting story on it here https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p02x3vwh
Beyond that, I think cross breeding some insights from other fields could bring some efficiency improvements to problems that are squarely in the domain of computer science. OS scheduling, for example, has plenty of related people/materials scheduling parallels in the Operations Research field, and possibly some in Auction Theory as well. Same for load balancing (e.g. The Min Cost Multi-Commodity Flow problem).
FRANCES H. ARNOLD Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2018
https://www.nobelprize.org/womenwhochangedscience/stories/fr...
Exploring protein fitness landscapes by directed evolution
https://armaghplanet.com/astronomy-magnetic-resonance-imagin...
Also, not an industry, but I think that some mathematicians use category theory to translate insights from one domain to other.
(Trying the recipe itself here to find a meta-recipe) I think an insight itself from category theory to a more general recipe could be: don't try to move "laterally" to other industry, but go first "up" from a specific solution to a more general interpretation, and see what more you can solve "down" from there.
The concept of bootstrapping. How to start something from nothing that eventually becomes self sustaining.
Compound interest and exponential growth. Particularly relevant to investing as well as the personal ‘growth’ mentality. The natural exponent that was discovered from compound interest is everywhere in mathematics and physics.
Originally came from the thought that seals on ammo boxes would cost soldiers precious time on the battlefield.
Today it's used for seal and repair in everyday life.
Seeing With The Tongue – Paul Bach-Y-Rita –
http://antonyhall.net/blog/seeing-with-the-tongue-paul-bach-...
https://www.wired.com/2011/08/0811hedy-lamar-george-antheil-...
Some of the "top" hospitals in the US are downright miserable to go to as a patient.
I suspect a big one is "regular" engineering vs software engineering. Regular engineering has schedules and (apart from the apple campus) can put up a building in a predictable amount of time. Also testing and maintenance and more.
https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/quantum-honeyb...
Is the breadth of knowledge related to cross domain discoveries?
I would say bringing narrow skills like management or IT or marketing to a company is what you want to aim for.
I'm not convinced cross domain issues exist at rates higher than internal domain issues. I think they are orders of magnitude lower.