HACKER Q&A
📣 anonquestions1

Company only considering female candidates for role. Is this legal?


Not trying to start a flame war. Genuinely trying to explore if this is normal, or legal. Sorry for the throwaway, but this is a sensitive topic.

The leadership of a large tech company I work with openly stated internally that they will only consider female candidates for a particular new executive-level role, to promote diversity. No male candidates would be considered.

After over half a year of searching, they were unable to find a female candidate who had the qualifications, experience, and skills at the level of billion-dollar multi national companies, who also wanted to relocate during a pandemic.

Eventually the company expanded the search to all candidates, regardless of gender. After many months later, the company found a qualified candidate for the role, and hired them. This candidate was a white man, and it was brought up at several company-wide meetings about how hard the company tried to only hire a woman, but was unable to get a qualified candidate.

Is this the new normal at tech companies? Is this even legal?


  👤 DanBC Accepted Answer ✓
You haven't stated where you live.

In England it's problematic. Here's the Equality and Human Rights Commission advice: https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/advice-and-guidance/h...

If a man and a woman apply for a job and they're both equally suitable you are allowed to select the woman because she's a woman if you intend to widen the diversity of your workforce. (Or, if you employ mostly women, you're allowed to select the man because he's a man). In law this is "a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim".


👤 LinuxBender
A lawyer or the labor law office in your state should answer that.

👤 anonquestions1
OP here. Forgot to mention I’m in America.

👤 gulato
It's legal where I live; ymmv