Yes, file formats are usually interchangeable. No, that interchangeability is not perfect, especially once you get away from word processing and into spreadsheets and presentations.
The majority of people your partner has to work with outside of their charity will be using Office so these small issues will constantly cause friction and frustration.
Does your partner want to waste time on those issues or do they want to focus their energy on the good work of the charity?
And, since we're talking about a charity, O365 is probably available at a reduced price, or even free.
I supported all the technical aspects of a friend’s charity in their early days. Originally set them up on Zoho for cheapness before they were a fully registered charity. Zoho worked but caused plenty of pain for their less computer proficient users (volunteers and trustees). The Zoho UX is very clunky and the team required a lot of support. Migration to Office 365 made everyone very happy because of the familiarity (everyone is used to it from work). The charity requires less support time now and no longer complain about Zoho’s limitations.
https://support.google.com/a/answer/9223653?en
(Though this may involve upgrading to a paid business license for G Suite, if your partner is currently using the free charity tier.)
Just because of the headache involved in transferring, I'd ask her to check with legal again. It would be very unusual to require UK-based storage specifically.
If that truly is a requirement, then cloud storage is basically not an option. Just keep everything as Office documents on a local network hard drive and set up recurring backups to an off-site location (probably your partner's home).
Google apps are a good alternative to Office365 but we haven't found anything that matches Excel. We're a fintech so there's no way around excel. You'll also have to deal with users who are using excel files locally.
You will never the conveniences of the a paid powerhouse developed by thousands of people over the years, but for next to nothing cost and a little bit of effort you can be just as productive.
Oh, GNU/emacs? Well, You can run your own OSS openoffice/sunoffice (whatever it's called nowadays) and file sharing but it's alot of work and not no maintenance.
She should push back on that, since there is no legal basis for it (except in very specific circumstances).
It would be cheaper to get competent legal advice than do a shift like this for many offices.
I'd check the specific requirements though. Even DPA doesn't really require hosting in the UK, but UK or country with matching privacy requirements, which in most cases means whole EU is ok.
not related to them, not even a user.
The overall experience is not as smooth as with Google or MS, but I do have Exchange protocol, file storage with management and online document editing and it works.
First time it took me almost two weeks to setup everything, but I've been doing the same setup for my friends, for their small to mid sized companies for less than a week.
Their main website is not managed well but they have a pretty active development community, very useful mailing list (you can browse the archive) and somewhat dated documentation but the changes are not that hard to figure out.
Once everything is set, the update process and maintenance are almost automatic through the native linux package manager.
Pros:
- All the creature comforts of mainstream suites such as realtime collaboration, comments, history, etc.
- 2-way compatible with Office and Google so you can import docs to and from those suites.
- Encrypted document support
- Self hosted
Cons:
- Requires you to own a synology NAS to host it.
https://www.synology.com/en-us/dsm/feature/office
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/nonprofit/offi...
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/nonprofits/eligibility
You can create an account and upload the documentation https://nonprofit.microsoft.com/en-us/getting-started
I'm running ours on a $10 DigitalOcean box.
1) What law they think is being broken (and they need to actually link the specific clause)
2) Why they think G Suite is breaking it (and they need to describe that breach in terms of the law they think is being broken).
3) How much they're prepared to spend on changing from G Suite to something else, including costs of migrating data, checking it's correct after migration, re-training, and any possible software and support costs.
G Suite claims it's GDPR compliant. https://cloud.google.com/security/gdpr
Notes + PM -> notion.so
Word -> notion.so
PowerPoint -> slidebean.com or pitch.com
Excel/Access -> still AirTable
Outlook -> amazing email UX via hey.com for $99/year
I got many of these via alternativeto.net and producthunt.com