I also have read a little bit about zero-sum bias (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-sum_thinking), and also read about it being intuitive, but not rational, especially as pointed out by economists. An article is highlighed are here https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/5CyuxotJ5XkeXXbZK/one-reason-why-capitalism-is-much-maligned
I seem to understand, in very simplistic terms, that it's the ability to create and think, that what gives rises to win-win games. And in general, it's better to have a win-win attitude, than a win-lose or the worst, have a lose-lose attitude.
But my question here is, all these discussions are pertaining to humans. Humans have become beter off than they were 50 years ago. But, with respect to what I start the discussion, sustainability, is it that nature is becoming worse of overall, for the humans to become better off ? Or it's a positive sum game for whole of earth ?
I would be really greateful for the thoughts of the HN community on this idea.
[1]: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Sustainability
So nature isn't exactly a fixed pile of resources that we draw from.
The earth isn't a closed system. Sunlight, which is for all intents and purposes infinite, is a vital resource for the world's food supply, plants, and everything that depends on them.
With 7+ billion humans on earth, if you knew nothing about the water cycle, you might think that the oceans would run out of water in a few centuries. But ocean levels are rising, not falling. Because much of the water we consume goes back to nature one way or another.
It's more complicated than zero-sum.