Though I have had a subjective experience that Zoom has better audio quality, yesterday we did a test by having the same meeting in both Meet and Zoom. All participants agreed the audio quality was better for them (even with video turned on).
Why is this? Are Zoom's codecs superior? Does Zoom have an internal network which routes better than public internet WebRTC? Do they have better voice picking and echo cancellations?
A lot of WebRTC software made by hobbyists has usually much better quality than Zoom has.
PS: Zoom also sucks in their over-compressed 720p. I use a Canon camera with a separate HDMI->USB encoder and what I get straight from that setup vs what Zoom can handle are two different worlds. Shame, again.
PS2: I've been using videoconferencing tools since 1995 (I was also selling high end ones like Cisco) for a long time. The quality delivered by them has been very good for a really long time. Zoom isn't even comparable to something like mid-range Polycom ;/
I use Zoom a lot, but let's be honest - the only good things about it is price and reliability (and good noise canceling tailored up to shitty laptop microphones). I tell you, guys, the Zoom people don't want to pay for bandwidth...
I can understand, though, that someone who uses only a laptop for calls might be in love with Zoom. Myself I'll rather zoom out of that product toward something better focused on quality, especially audio. Immersive experience is important to me. I don't expect that much. Just a stable 1080p (sharp!) and a RedBook audio.
(before anyone is going to ask: I sit on a 1 Gbps fiber... And my PC is an i7 with 16GB RAM)