For example, I remember reading about an example where a person put together a ridesharing algorithm years before Uber and Lyft. Some people would say that person saw the future or that they were "right all along". But then there's the argument that they worked on something that had no potential at that time, ie: years before the modern cellphone was widely used.
I also know someone that had built a "cloud kitchen" a decade ago. They could've been "right", but ultimately at that time, they failed.
Maybe this thinking is too dichotomic, but I do wonder if there's a thoughtful way to consider these situations with hindsight.
With true randomness, we'd expect that we'd be 'right' about as often as we get things 'wrong'.