For example, this comment by BAReF00t from a couple of months ago [1]:
"Browsers are a case of monolithism (and the inner-platform effect, of course). In actuality, they are multiple different kinds of programs, welded together for no sensible reason: an http fetching daemon, a "runner" to open URLs, several document viewers, a virtual machine, an OS with an API, extensive libraries for everything that the OS below the OS already offered, one or several programming language JIT compiler(s) and runtime(s), and some bits and pieces. In a healthy environment, there would not be a second OS on top of the normal one. And all those parts would be separate software, with standardized interfaces. ..."
Years ago Rob Pike responded this way to complaints that there was no browser for the Plan 9 operating system [2]:
"While that would be better than no browser at all, Mozilla is just the sort of stand-alone monolith that we're trying to argue against. And of course, everyone else in the world is trying to turn their system into a giant web browser. I'd rather see web access be one aspect of a system in which the pieces work in concert."
1. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21052915
2. http://p9.nyx.link/netlib/9fans/9fans.0007 (post dated 18 Jul 2000 about halfway down)
How does that follow?
Are you looking for some kind of compiled-language extensions maybe?